Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
the adviser logo
Lender

ASIC to prolong HEM dispute with Westpac

by Charbel Kadib4 minute read
ASIC

The corporate regulator will contest the Federal Court’s decision to dismiss its responsible lending case against Westpac. 

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has filed an appeal with the Full Federal Court of Australia against Justice Nye Perram’s decision to dismiss its case against Westpac, which related to alleged breaches of responsible lending obligations in its issuance of home loans through the use of the Household Expenditure Measure (HEM) benchmark. 

To continue reading the rest of this article, create a free account
Already have an account? Sign in

In September 2018, Westpac admitted to breaches of responsible lending obligations when issuing home loans to customers and agreed to pay a $35-million civil penalty to resolve Federal Court proceedings under the National Credit Act.

However, the Federal Court was tentative in its approach to the matter.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Justice Nye Perram had sought a friend of the court to consider whether the Westpac case even constituted a breach of the NCCP (reportedly stating that “there is no fact before [him] that any unsuitable loans were made”).

Following his review of the case, Justice Perram judged that a lender “may do what it wants in the assessment process”, noting that other provisions of the NCCP impose penalties if lenders make unsuitable loans as a result of that process.

However, ASIC commissioner Sean Hughes said ASIC’s decision to appeal the verdict has been made to address “uncertainty” caused by Justice Perram’s decision.  

“The Credit Act imposes a number of legal obligations on credit providers, including the need to make reasonable inquiries about a borrower’s financial circumstances, verifying information obtained from borrowers, and making an assessment of whether a loan is unsuitable for the borrower,” he said.

“ASIC considers that the Federal Court’s decision creates uncertainty as to what is required for a lender to comply with its assessment obligation, nor does ASIC regard the decision as consistent with the legislative intention of the responsible lending regime."

He concluded: “For those reasons, ASIC will appeal to the Full Court of the Federal Court.”

In response to ASIC's announcement, Westpac has stated: "Westpac acknowledges that today ASIC has filed an appeal with the Full Federal Court in relation to proceedings against Westpac regarding its responsible lending obligations."

[Related: ASIC takes banks to court over ‘unfair’ loan terms]

ASIC to prolong HEM dispute with Westpac
asic ta
TheAdviser logo
asic ta

Charbel Kadib

Charbel Kadib

AUTHOR

Charbel Kadib is the news editor on The Adviser and Mortgage Business.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

You need to be a member to post comments. Register for free today

MORE FROM THE ADVISER

mark pesce futurist ajxjkn

Automation is changing, not replacing, the role of finance brokers

On Thursday (4 August), the Australian Financial Review (AFR) ran a story with the headline: “Finance brokers top...

READ MORE
des hang carbar zaheer jappie carclarity ta qtvnqr

CarClarity confirms partnership with car subscription platform

Established in March 2020, CarClairty is a finance platform that connects car buyers with more than 30 different...

READ MORE
anthony albanese profile ta vtpifc

Further grants confirmed for flood survivors, $47m pledged

According to a statement released by the federal government, the Back Home grant will be made available to impacted...

READ MORE
magazine
Read the latest issue of The Adviser magazine!
The Adviser is the number one magazine for Australia's finance and mortgage brokers. The publications delivers news, analysis, business intelligence, sales and marketing strategies, research and key target reports to an audience of professional mortgage and finance brokers
Read more