Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
the adviser logo
Growth

Lawyer warns against FOFA-style reforms in broking

by James Mitchell4 minute read
Jon Denovan

A top lawyer has warned that scrapping broker commissions and implementing a fee-for-service model would be a “disservice” to Australian borrowers.

Gadens partner Jon Denovan told The Adviser that regulators investigating brokers' remuneration must avoid the outcomes of the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) reforms, which he believes disenfranchised the majority of Australians from seeking financial advice.

To continue reading the rest of this article, create a free account
Already have an account? Sign in

“Mark Bouris and Yellow Brick Road are making a sterling effort to try and provide financial advice in a cost- effective away, but they still have to charge to make a dollar,” Mr Denovan said.

“The rules and regulations are so extensive that it’s quite a big dollar. It would be a great disservice to the community if you had to pay to see a mortgage broker.”

Advertisement
Advertisement

Mr Denovan said ASIC has approached the review – which he expects will continue until the end of 2016 with “no preconceptions and no bias”, adding that the regulator is well aware that there is a big difference between credit and financial advice.

However, he warned that brokers selling the wrong products for higher commissions will run into trouble.

“If they go in there and find that people are being sold the wrong product because of higher commissions then they have a problem. If there is a material number of people who are doing the wrong thing then we’re in trouble,” Mr Denovan said.

“But it doesn’t matter if you get more commission so long as the product is equal. Your in-house brand might give you a bigger commission, but as long as your in-house brand is appropriate for the customer, you can sell it till the cows come home.”

Mr Denovan said one danger for brokers is in the subprime mortgage space.

“It might be easy to be attracted by higher commissions paid by some non-prime lenders,” he said.

“But you should be seeking out a non-prime lender who is providing a good competitive product.”

[Related: eChoice flags 'very real' danger of commission changes]

Lawyer warns against FOFA-style reforms in broking
jon denovan  x
TheAdviser logo
jon denovan  x

James Mitchell

James Mitchell

AUTHOR

James Mitchell has over eight years’ experience as a financial reporter and is the editor of Wealth and Wellness at Momentum Media.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

You need to be a member to post comments. Register for free today

MORE FROM THE ADVISER

mark pesce futurist ajxjkn

Automation is changing, not replacing, the role of finance brokers

On Thursday (4 August), the Australian Financial Review (AFR) ran a story with the headline: “Finance brokers top...

READ MORE
des hang carbar zaheer jappie carclarity ta qtvnqr

CarClarity confirms partnership with car subscription platform

Established in March 2020, CarClairty is a finance platform that connects car buyers with more than 30 different...

READ MORE
anthony albanese profile ta vtpifc

Further grants confirmed for flood survivors, $47m pledged

According to a statement released by the federal government, the Back Home grant will be made available to impacted...

READ MORE
magazine
Read the latest issue of The Adviser magazine!
The Adviser is the number one magazine for Australia's finance and mortgage brokers. The publications delivers news, analysis, business intelligence, sales and marketing strategies, research and key target reports to an audience of professional mortgage and finance brokers
Read more