the adviser logo

‘Strong reservations’ with ASIC’s ‘overreaching’: FBAA

by Annie Kane5 minute read
‘Strong reservations’ with ASIC’s ‘overreaching’: FBAA
While welcoming the Senate committee’s position on removing RLOs and extending BID, the managing director of the FBAA has raised “strong reservations” with how ASIC would regulate the industry moving forward.
On Friday (12 March), the Senate economics legislation committee released its final report for its inquiry into the National Consumer Credit Protection Amendment (Supporting Economic Recovery) Bill 2020.

While the managing director of the Finance Brokers Association of Australia (FBAA), Peter White, welcomed the recommendation for government to pass the bill, he told The Adviser that he had concerns relating to how an expanded BID would be regulated.

To continue reading the rest of this article, create a free account
Already have an account? Sign in

Mr White said: “The outcome was not unexpected, and we support the government’s intent with these. 

“We’ve always supported the principle of the movements for RLOs and the BID extension, but have strong reservations as to how ASIC will regulate this as they have shown progressively over the years that they are overreaching where the law lands,” he said.


Mr White suggested that the compliance disputes such as those brought to the fore by th“wagyu and shiraz” case between the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and Westpac would therefore be removed with the proposed repeal.

He continued: “ADIs have operated under responsible lending governance from before RG 209 existed, so the ‘rewind’ is, basically, (one hopes) to what was always there in the late 2000 era. But, as ASIC intervened over the years, it became very borrower-credit restrictive, leading to this decision/outcome.”

He told The Adviser: “I’m still worried, though, as to how non-ADIs will fair being left under ASIC, and this needs the Treasurer or Treasury to closely watch ASIC to ensure no anti-competitive credit policy environments evolve between ADIs and non-ADIs due to ASIC’s possible overreaching governance.”

Mr White said two “classic examples” of this were: “where credit cards landed with BID (i.e. they should never have been captured and was agreed by government and Treasury to be the case)” and consumer asset loans (e.g. car loans).

“Just before Christmas, ASIC basically said mortgage brokers are to write such applications with no income [fully apply ‘dial down’ to commissions], and this is now a significant risk of collapsing the ‘finance’ broker marketplace in this area,” he said.

“There are huge industry risks if Treasury or the Treasurer doesn’t ensure this ASIC habit doesn’t stop” he said.

‘Strong reservations’ with ASIC’s ‘overreaching’: FBAA
peter white
TheAdviser logo
peter white

Annie Kane

Annie Kane


Annie Kane is the editor of The Adviser and Mortgage Business.


You need to be a member to post comments. Register for free today


sam jolley elders ta iwsfut

Elders welcomes 1st national growth and asset finance manager

Elders Home and Commercial Finance, the independent broking arm aligned with the real estate network of Elders Ltd,...

rael ross butn ta rerexr

Butn achieves record originations in July

Cash flow financier Butn has released a trading update, revealing that its 2023 financial year commenced with a new...

daniel tuttlebee resimac asset fInance ta l27zun

Resimac takes controlling stake in Sonder

Resimac Asset Finance has expanded its acquisition stake in equipment finance business Sonder Equipment Finance...

Read the latest issue of The Adviser magazine!
The Adviser is the number one magazine for Australia's finance and mortgage brokers. The publications delivers news, analysis, business intelligence, sales and marketing strategies, research and key target reports to an audience of professional mortgage and finance brokers
Read more