Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
the adviser logo
Compliance

Law firm slams ‘inequitable’ AFCA reforms

by Reporter5 minute read
Court

Reforms to extend AFCA’s jurisdiction are “inequitable” and “inconsistent”, according to a Queensland-based law firm.

Creevey Russell Lawyers has called for revisions to the banking royal commission’s recommendation to extend the normal six-year limitation period to commence litigation by permitting the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) to deal with matters arising after 1 January 2008.

To continue reading the rest of this article, create a free account
Already have an account? Sign in

Creevey Russell principal Dan Creevey urged Treasury to broaden the scope of the reforms, which are currently limited to matters involving credit facilities of less than $5 million.

Mr Creevey also called on policymakers to extend the reforms to businesses and farmers with facilities greater than $5 million, which he said are “worse off” under existing arrangements.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“We have raised this matter with the Department of Treasury which is dealing with this area of post-Hayne reforms and they have advised they are considering whether and how they will deal with this gap,” Mr Creevey said.

“Our view is that, as a matter of common sense, it would be inconsistent to not implement an extension of the normal six-year limitation period similar to the extensions of time in relation to credit facilities under $5 million under the AFCA.

“Aggrieved businesses and farmers with facilities over $5 million are likely to have suffered greater losses. They may well now be in a worse financial position than parties with credit facilities under $5 million who are able to seek compensation through AFCA.”

Mr Creevey claimed that it would be “inconsistent” and “inequitable” not to provide a similar extension to businesses and farmers.

“These parties would need to fund their own actions so that there would be no cost to government,” he said.

“We think this matter needs to be raised with politicians by aggrieved farmers and on their behalf by bodies such as the National Farmers Federation (NFF) to ensure this unfair and unjust gap is closed. 

“We have notified the NFF of this issue of concern.”

[Related: New credit card rules will impact brokers, says lawyer]

 

Law firm slams ‘inequitable’ AFCA reforms
courtroom law ta
TheAdviser logo
courtroom law ta

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

You need to be a member to post comments. Register for free today

MORE FROM THE ADVISER

mark lewis fast ta llosc4

In Memoriam: Mark Lewis, 1963–2022

Mark Lewis passed away on Saturday (13 August). Mr Lewis was a well-known identity in the third-party broker...

READ MORE
anthony waldron mortgage choice ta ithtxm

Broker expertise key for securing right loan: Mortgage Choice

The data, which is derived from a June survey of 1,002 broker customers and conducted by Honeycomb Strategy,...

READ MORE
Mark Bouris new ifa

Brokers need to focus on the ‘value-add’: Mark Bouris

With competition among brokers increasing as the number of brokers rises – coupled with the fact that fewer...

READ MORE
magazine
Read the latest issue of The Adviser magazine!
The Adviser is the number one magazine for Australia's finance and mortgage brokers. The publications delivers news, analysis, business intelligence, sales and marketing strategies, research and key target reports to an audience of professional mortgage and finance brokers
Read more