the adviser logo

Vertical integration creates ‘conflict of interest’ for brokers: PC

by Reporter5 minute read
conflict of interest

Brokers that process loans through lender-owned aggregators could be facing conflicts of interest, according to the Productivity Commission.

In the Productivity Commission’s (PC) draft report into competition in the Australian financial system, the commission expressed concern over vertical integration in the mortgage broking industry, claiming that lenders are wielding “significant influence” over aggregators.

To continue reading the rest of this article, create a free account
Already have an account? Sign in

In its substantial draft report, the PC warned: “Vertical integration can create conflicts of interest for brokers through a lender’s position as both a member of an aggregator’s panel and a shareholder with significant influence over the aggregator’s activities.”

The PC added that lender-owned aggregators are of “greater concern” and are particularly at risk of working against a client’s best interest.


“Lender-owned aggregators therefore face greater conflicts of interest than independent aggregators, and are of greater concern to the commission.”

The commission stated that conflicts of interest are “especially apparent” when lenders fund white label loan products offered through their aggregator subsidiaries.

The PC cited research from the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), which found that a lender’s market share through the broker channel was generally higher through their own aggregator subsidiary relative to their share of the overall broker channel.

“This difference was substantial in some cases — in 2015, for example, CBA had a 21 per cent overall market share within the broker channel, but its market share within Aussie Home Loans (in which it had an 80 per cent ownership stake at the time) was 37 per cent,” the report reads.

While welcoming the industry’s commitment to “more clearly disclose” ownership structures — as advised in ASIC’s review of broker remuneration — the PC called for a legal provision to be imposed by ASIC to require lender-owned aggregators to work in the “best interest” of customers.

Draft recommendation 8.1 reads: “The Australian Securities and Investments Commission should impose a clear legal duty on mortgage aggregators owned by lenders to act in the consumer’s best interests.

“Such a duty should be imposed even if these aggregators operate as independent subsidiaries of their parent lender institution, and should also apply to the mortgage brokers operating under them.”

However, despite arguing that there is a “strong case” for a legal duty of care to be applied to “all brokers”, the PC noted that “in the first instance”, it should apply to lender-owned aggregators with the “potential for the greatest conflict of interest”.

[Related: Association heads slam Productivity Commission findings]

Vertical integration creates ‘conflict of interest’ for brokers: PC
chess conflict
TheAdviser logo
chess conflict


You need to be a member to post comments. Register for free today


sam jolley elders ta iwsfut

Elders welcomes 1st national growth and asset finance manager

Elders Home and Commercial Finance, the independent broking arm aligned with the real estate network of Elders Ltd,...

rael ross butn ta rerexr

Butn achieves record originations in July

Cash flow financier Butn has released a trading update, revealing that its 2023 financial year commenced with a new...

daniel tuttlebee resimac asset fInance ta l27zun

Resimac takes controlling stake in Sonder

Resimac Asset Finance has expanded its acquisition stake in equipment finance business Sonder Equipment Finance...

Read the latest issue of The Adviser magazine!
The Adviser is the number one magazine for Australia's finance and mortgage brokers. The publications delivers news, analysis, business intelligence, sales and marketing strategies, research and key target reports to an audience of professional mortgage and finance brokers
Read more