Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.

Re-accreditation issues impeding aggregator switching

consultationpaper consultationpaper
Annie Kane 8 minute read

Difficulty in re-accrediting with lenders when switching aggregators has been cited by brokers as one of the biggest barriers to changing groups, according to new research.

In September 2019, Momentum Intelligence conducted its annual broker survey of aggregation groups, the Aggregator of Choice survey, to understand what most drives broker satisfaction.

This year, the research resulted in a total usable sample of 1,233 brokers.

Both quantitative and qualitative research methodologies were adopted for this year’s survey, with participants asked to complete a self-administered questionnaire via an online survey portal, and a number of in-depth phone interviews were also conducted with brokers who participated in the survey.


These interviews primarily focused on the hearing the first-hand experiences of brokers who have switched aggregators within the last 12 months to uncover their perceptions of the switching process.

Overall, the results of the 2019 Aggregator of Choice survey found that 86 per cent of brokers are satisfied with their aggregator, with only 8 per cent planning to leave in the next 12 months.

However, the research found that there were major barriers to switching groups – with these barriers putting brokers off changing groups, even if they were dissatisfied with their current aggregator.

During the phone interviews conducted, brokers outlined that – beyond the issues with trail portability, issues with CRM population, and adapting to new software, systems and processes – the main barrier to switching aggregation groups was the difficulty of re-accrediting with lenders.

Specifically, brokers lamented the time it now takes to become accredited with lenders once they have joined a new aggregator, with some revealing that they had started the re-accreditation process in February and still had not completed the process.


One aspect slowing down the process, brokers said, was the need to re-do training to become re-accredited and to undergo each lender’s individual requirements – a factor that has compounded since the banking royal commission during which some lenders reduced their accreditation appetites – while another delaying factor cited was the linear and manual nature of the process.

Another recurring issue was the fact that some lenders appeared to be dragging their heels on finalising accreditations.

Brokers said that the issues with accreditation had been hurting their businesses as they were unable to write loans to those lenders during that period, which in turn impacts the range of loans and offerings they can offer clients.

According to some brokers, this issue is restricting the ability for brokers to switch and impacting the appetite to do so – even if they are unhappy with their current aggregator – as brokers want to first and foremost offer their clients a full suite of products.

One broker told Momentum Intelligence: “If it was more seamless… I think the aggregators would be on their toes, because although they say you’re not locked into us, youre almost indirectly locked in, because its difficult to go through that whole process.”

Another said: “Ill never ever swap aggregators again unless I was so unhappy with [aggregator] that it was affecting my business and my, you know, my bottom line, then maybe I’d think about it, but itd have to take a lot to get me to someone else.

Another agreed, stating: “Looking at the whole process of moving aggregators, its an enormous process. It would probably be where its stopping anyone moving around because the process is just so cumbersome.”

Brokers therefore suggested that aggregators could take a more proactive approach to coordinating with lenders to make the re-accreditation process more seamless and transferable across groups, which would enable more brokers to switch groups and ensure they are offering clients the best possible solution for their needs.

The full comprehensive results of the Aggregator of Choice survey 2019 are available for purchase through Momentum Intelligence. This interactive report is designed to be a detailed competitive analysis tool for aggregators to view, compare and contrast their performance against the market.

For more information, please contact This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

[Related: Brokers rate non-major as the best performing bank]



Re-accreditation issues impeding aggregator switching
TheAdviser logo

Grow your business exponentially in 2022!

Discover the right strategies to build a more structured, efficient and profitable businesses at The Adviser’s 2022 Business Accelerator Program.

Visit the website here to secure your ticket.

Annie Kane

Annie Kane

Annie Kane is the editor of The Adviser and Mortgage Business.

As well as writing about the Australian broking industry, the mortgage market, financial regulation, fintechs and the wider lending landscape – Annie is also the host of the Elite Broker and In Focus podcasts and The Adviser Live webcasts. 

Email Annie at: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.



more from the adviser
data banking CDR

Breaking News

Sherlok secures access to open banking data

The mortgage technology provider has tapped into open banking dat...

money grants

Breaking News

Grow Finance concludes $35m capital raise

The lender’s co-chief executive believes this will sustain gro...

Siobhan Williams 850 ta

Breaking News

Pepper names mortgages head

The non-bank lender has appointed a new head to lead its residen...