Several non-bank lenders have been voicing their support for the broker channel and highlighting their dependence on them following the release of the banking royal commission final report.
Leading non-bank lenders have been voicing their support for the broker channel and highlighting their dependence on them following the release of the banking royal commission final report.
On Monday (4 February), the final report from the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry recommended that changes in brokers’ remuneration should be made over a period of two or three years, by first prohibiting lenders from paying trail commission on new loans and by then prohibiting lenders from paying other commissions to brokers.
The industry has reacted with shock, anger and dismay at the recommendations, with some saying the changes would have a “significant impact” on the viability of the broker channel and potentially damage competition in the marketplace.
Indeed, Anthony Waldron, NAB executive general manager of broker partnerships and chairman of the Combined Industry Forum, recently said “brokers have enabled smaller lenders to compete, which is ultimately good for consumers.”
While many have focused on the ability of brokers to boost competition by placing downward pressure on lenders to reduce rates, it should also be noted that many smaller lenders rely almost entirely on the third-party channel for distribution and their future viability could also be impacted if the channel is negatively impacted by the proposed changes.
Indeed, since the release of the final report, several non-bank lenders have come out voicing their support for the broker channel and highlighting the competition that they provide.
Brokers provide 'a wide variety of loan choices to borrowers from all walks of life'
Pepper Money CEO Mario Rehayem commented: “This week’s release of the banking royal commission’s final report and recommendations singled out mortgage brokers and the changes to their remuneration model. As a result, many brokers we have spoken with say they are being forced to reassess their futures in the industry.
“Pepper Money supports the broker channel because we believe they provide a wide variety of loan choices to borrowers from all walks of life – something the banks frequently do not do.
“By taking time to understand a customers’ individual borrowing needs and sourcing appropriate loans, expert and customer-centred brokers are part of the process of creating wealth for first home buyers, young families and professionals.”
Mr Rehayem continued: “Pepper Money also believes brokers play a vital role in supporting competition in the financial services industry.
“It is no coincidence that brokers’ market share has grown to close to 60 per cent of all mortgages written. Australians have voted with their feet to support the broker channel.
“Pepper Money expects to play a leading role driving a regulatory outcome on the remuneration model issue that is both in the best interests of borrowers and sustainable for brokers.”
'The banks are going to become increasingly expensive'
Likewise, Andrew Way, director at Semper Capital, commented that historical “abuses” of conduct and regulation were “incubated” by “the lack of an active and able competition”.
Mr Way said: “Just as the market starts to respond with newcomers, including state-based banks, cooperatives, building societies and non-bank lenders, the commission recommends the removal of trail commissions, which will decimate the very distribution networks these competitors rely on.”
He continued: “The banks are going to become increasingly expensive. The burden of legacy retail branch networks is an inhibitor to rate reduction, as is the need to take rate from home loans to prop up unsecured lending. What better opportunity then to reduce competition by removing the distribution networks that are encroaching on bank rate territory and have the capacity to improve price-efficiency?
“Just as the finance playing field looks to be levelling, the royal commission for some inexplicable reason takes aim at the one thing competitors to the four banks need – broker distribution networks.
“We taxpayers funded the royal commission. Non-banks lenders benefit from broker distribution networks and SMEs are going to rely on them too because it will be non-bank lenders increasingly meeting their needs.
“So, is now really the time to disrupt the country’s most effective distribution system when a couple of simple regulatory calculations could do for broker commission fairness and transparency what comparison rates did for interest rates? I think not.”
The Semper Capital director concluded: “A cynic might cry conspiracy and we taxpayers may be the losers from a vast reduction in competition to the banks.
“But for now, we encourage the broking community to have an active voice against the commission’s recommendations, though not indulge in a knee-jerk, catastrophic response.
“In the meantime, where possible and when in your client’s benefit, consider making a stance and supporting lenders that are invested in the industry and demonstrate to the big four, in real terms, what it means to alienate our community.”
Important that change don't 'put broker services out of reach of ordinary Australians'
Non-bank lender Firstmac has also hit out at the “betrayal” of the royal commission recommendations and called on mortgage brokers to stop sending business to the big four banks in response.
Firstmac’s managing director, Kim Cannon, said the big banks had prompted the royal commission through a series of scandals and had then successfully “deflected blame” onto mortgage brokers.
“The big banks saved themselves by brazenly throwing mortgage brokers under the bus,” Mr Cannon said.
“The only reasonable response from mortgage brokers is to protect themselves by diversifying their businesses so they aren’t so reliant on the banks.”
Mr Cannon said it was unfair that tens of thousands of mortgage brokers could suffer severe financial stress as a result of changes recommended by the royal commission while shares in the big banks had rallied nearly 5 per cent in a day.
“Australians have nothing against mortgage brokers and it wasn’t the brokers that provoked this royal commission, yet they are the biggest losers from the commission’s recommendations,” Mr Cannon said.
“We are very disappointed that mortgage brokers have been made into fall guys for the banks and we support them 100 per cent.
“We will work with brokers to ensure that their businesses remain viable despite this very cruel and unfair blow.”
Mr Cannon added that the government should be careful to ensure that broking services remained affordable for the general public.
“It is very important that any changes to the commission structure for brokers don’t put their services out of reach of ordinary Australians,” Mr Cannon concluded.
“Mortgage broking advice must remain a service that everyone can afford, not just the rich.”
'A major role in putting non-bank lending alternatives to their clients'
SME lenders have also been coming to the fore, with Scottish Pacific's CEO Peter Langham stating that adding a broker fee for service is likely to be "detrimental to anybody who can't get funding from the banks".
"Brokers play a major role in putting non-bank lending alternatives to their clients, providing real solutions for business owners when the banks can’t or won’t lend to them.
A Fee for service is likely to drive borrowers straight to those with the biggest advertising budget," he said.
"Brokers have helped drive lending competition and increased the visibility of non-bank lenders – Australia’s ability to provide diverse lending options for consumers and SMEs could go backwards if the fee for service is implemented. Whatever happens to brokers will be critical to the whole consumer and SME lending space.
"Brokers provide an essential service for anyone looking for help finding the right funding solution, whether they want a home loan, a way to finance a piece of essential equipment, or a working capital facility that allows their business to grow. Without the independent broker, the consumer might lack the ability to see all the options open to them and end up picking funding that isn’t right for them," Mr Langham concluded.
A new campaign backed by the Mortgage & Finance Association of Australia, along with several aggregators and lenders, was also launched this week reminding borrowers of the value that mortgage brokers provide in providing competition, choice and access to credit.
The “Don’t Kill Competition” campaign aims to demonstrate to a mass audience the negative ramifications of potential policy changes that could be brought about as a result of the the recommendations from the financial services royal commission.
The sentiment was also raised by FBAA managing director Peter White, who commented: “Mortgage brokers provide competition and choice, and give borrowers lending options that most people are just not aware of, and these options enable borrowers to get better outcomes.”
Annie Kane is the editor of The Adviser and Mortgage Business.
As well as writing about the Australian broking industry, the mortgage market, financial regulation, fintechs and the wider lending landscape – Annie is also the host of the Elite Broker and In Focus podcasts and The Adviser Live webcasts.
The need to create a more inclusive broking industry is more impo...
Women would need 10 months longer to save for a 20 per cent depos...
In the latest Elite Broker podcast, broker and podcaster Marcus R...