The royal commission is calling for more information regarding verification of expenses and whether the use of benchmarks is appropriate when assessing the suitability of a loan for a customer.
Rounding up the concerns arising from several case studies that were looked at over the course of the first round of hearings at the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry, counsel assisting Rowena Orr outlined that it was now open to make findings on a range of topics involving the banks.
The commission heard, over the course of the hearings, that ANZ relied heavily on brokers to make inquiries into a customer’s financial situation.
“The results of the broker’s inquiries about the customer’s financial position are provided to ANZ in a document referred to as a statement of financial position, which is signed by both the customer and the broker.
“The evidence establishes that ANZ does not take any steps to verify the customer’s general living expenses as declared on this form.
“The evidence also establishes that where ANZ holds information about a customer that is inconsistent with information about the customer’s expenses, as recorded on this form, it disregards that other information and does not make any further inquiries into that inconsistency.”
Ms Orr then reiterated a case study involving a pensioner that was granted a $50,000 home loan to pay individuals overseas, despite his actual expenses being recorded as “half their true value”. She added that the bank incorrectly filled a hardship application form on his behalf, among other failures.
The counsel outlined that it was open to the Commissioner to make a range of findings of misconduct against ANZ, including that “ANZ’s policies and procedures relating to broker initiated home loans are inadequate as they do not provide a system for ANZ to take reasonable steps to verify a consumer’s financial situation insofar as that verification relates to a customer’s general living expense”.
This evidence, as well as much more, led Ms Orr to call on all parties with leave to appear to provide written submissions addressing the following questions which arose from the ANZ case study:
The commissioner went further, asking: “Is the use of any benchmark suitable? HEM, Henderson Poverty, a newly devised benchmark, is the use of any benchmark suitable?
“Second, as a related issue, in light of the evidence that has been given, I think, by a number of witnesses, that by and large customers are poor historians when it comes to identifying their outgoings. People are not very good at providing the information, not for want of trying, not for want of prompting, just by and large people are poor historians.
“What does that say, if anything, about judging home loans on a measure of UMI [Uncommitted Monthly Income]?”
He continued: “Now, those are very large questions, and it may be that they are questions that are ultimately better treated much later in the course of the Commission’s work. I don’t know.
“But those who are preparing submissions about HEM and its use, I think need to be on notice that there may be questions of the kind that I have mentioned which are then provoked by whatever conclusions I get to about HEM.”
[Related: ANZ accused of non-compliance with NCCP]
The federal government has released final regulations that define...
Nearly a quarter of those Australians who have dipped into their ...
The association for customer-owned banks has said that the MOU be...