Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.

‘Limited’ recourse for borrowers once mortgage discharged

financial financial
Lucy Dean 4 minute read

Borrowers have limited rights against a lender once their mortgage has been discharged, the Supreme Court of New South Wales has found.

In the recent case Australian Securities Ltd v Borina Pty Ltd, the Supreme Court found that after borrowers have paid out their mortgage, the only recourse they are entitled to is an ‘accounting’ between parties should there be a dispute.

Phil Kaunitz is partner at Kemp Strang, the law firm that acted for Australian Securities Limited (ASL). He told The Adviser: “The judgment is the most recent in a series of cases in which courts have found that, once a lender has discharged its mortgage, the borrower has limited rights against the lender.

“Specifically, the borrower can seek an accounting (which is a process by which the court considers any issues raised by the borrower and the lender and determines what is owing between them) but not any other remedy.”


In this case in particular, Borina Pty Ltd and ASL had a dispute over the expiry date of the loan, but before the dispute was heard, Borina refinanced its debt with ASL in return for a discharge of the mortgage.

Justice Davies did not grant Borina leave to pursue damages and held that, according to Kemp Strang: “The only right available to a borrower after redemption of its mortgage (excluding statutory rights) is for an accounting.”

Mr Kaunitz said that this finding, and similar findings in prior cases, are significant for lenders as they “limit” borrowers’ rights to a specific claim structure and “prevent the borrower from bringing other claims usually available to parties to a contract such as damages”.

Further: “The cases are significant for borrowers firstly because they prevent a borrower from bringing more than one claim against the lender, and secondly because, as seen in the Borina case, they demonstrate that bringing the wrong type of claim will cause the claim to fail.”

Kemp Strang noted that the finding highlighted that borrowers may not select certain aspects of the accounting and litigate only those, instead an account must be taken on a final basis.


Mr Kaunitz explained: “The cases have also held that a mortgagor cannot mount several different cases against a lender, raising various complaints about the lender's conduct throughout the course of the loan or its conduct in enforcing its mortgage. All issues must be resolved in a single 'accounting' process at the same time.”

[Related: CBA shareholders asked to submit claim on class action]

‘Limited’ recourse for borrowers once mortgage discharged
TheAdviser logo

If you’re feeling overworked and overwhelmed in this fast-paced mortgage market, it’s time to make some changes, and the Business Accelerator Program can help! Work smarter, not harder, in 2022 and beyond, visit the website here to secure your ticket.



more from the adviser
Beau Bertoli Greg Moshal 863x385jpg

Breaking News

Prospa squares up against banks, expands SME loan

The ASX-listed lender has flagged a new “all-in-one” business...

small business owner ta

Breaking News

Business credit demand bounces back in NSW

Data from the initial days of NSW reopening after lockdown has sh...


Breaking News

Hot Property: The biggest property headlines from the week 18-22 October

The weekly round-up of the biggest news stories from across Momen...