You have 0 free articles left this month.
Broker

Why an integrated growth, risk, and governance framework matters for mortgage brokers and aggregators

6 min read
Share this article on:

As the mortgage and finance industry continues to operate under increasing regulatory scrutiny, organisations that focus solely on settlement volumes, revenue growth, or market share may inadvertently expose themselves to greater compliance, operational, conduct, and reputational risks, warns FBAA CEO Leo Gagic.

Having spent more than two decades leading credit risk, governance, compliance, and operational risk functions across financial services, I have consistently observed that the highest-performing organisations are not necessarily those that grow the fastest, but those that establish strong foundations that enable sustainable growth.

The businesses best positioned for long-term success are those that adopt an integrated growth, risk, and governance framework. One where commercial performance is supported by robust compliance oversight, effective risk management, and strong accountability.

After all, sustainable growth is not simply about writing more business. It is about ensuring that growth is achieved within a framework that consistently delivers good customer outcomes, meets regulatory obligations, and protects the business from avoidable risks.

 
 

In practice, this means embedding compliance and risk management into daily operations, decision-making processes, broker behaviour, and leadership oversight rather than treating them as stand-alone control functions.

For brokers and aggregators, this approach provides confidence to customers, lenders, regulators, and stakeholders that the business is operating responsibly while continuing to grow and innovate. It also enables organisations to identify emerging risks earlier, drive accountability across teams, and foster a culture of continuous improvement.

Importantly, though, there is an art to getting the balance right.

Effective businesses understand that compliance and risk management investments should be aligned to the size, complexity, and risk profile of the organisation.

Investing too little can expose a business to significant regulatory and operational risks, while overinvesting can create unnecessary cost, complexity, and inefficiency.

The goal is to build fit-for-purpose capabilities that support both growth and resilience. This is why research and benchmarking are so important. Looking at organisations of a similar size and maturity that have successfully adopted better practices can provide valuable insights into what good alignment looks like. Learning from peers helps businesses understand where to focus resources, which controls add the most value, and how to develop a compliance and risk framework that is both effective and scalable.

In an environment where trust, transparency, and resilience are increasingly important, those businesses that can successfully balance growth ambitions with strong compliance and risk disciplines will be better equipped to thrive, adapt, and remain sustainable well into the future.

The most successful organisations will not be those that simply grow the fastest, but those that grow responsibly while embedding compliance, risk management, and continuous improvement into every aspect of their operating model.

What does good look like in practice?

For many brokers and aggregators, compliance can sometimes feel like a series of audits, file reviews, and annual attestations. However, a mature framework is far more comprehensive.

A strong organisation typically demonstrates:

  • Clear accountability for compliance and risk ownership.
  • Documented policies and procedures that are reviewed regularly.
  • Ongoing monitoring and quality assurance programs.
  • Meaningful management reporting and, if applicable, board oversight.
  • Structured incident and breach management processes.
  • Regular staff training and competency assessments.
  • Risk-based monitoring rather than one-size-fits-all reviews.
  • Continuous improvement processes driven by data and lessons learned.

Rather than asking “Are we compliant?”, mature businesses continually ask:

  • Where are our highest risks?
  • What indicators suggest an emerging issue?
  • Are customers consistently receiving appropriate outcomes?
  • Are our controls effective?
  • How do we compare with industry better practice?

Example framework for managing growth, risk, and compliance

A practical framework for brokers and aggregators can be structured around three interconnected pillars:

Pillar 1: Growth

Objective: Grow profitably while maintaining customer trust.

Key measures:

  • settlement growth
  • revenue growth
  • customer retention
  • referral rates
  • customer satisfaction
  • broker productivity.

Example controls:

  • growth strategy reviews
  • product suitability monitoring
  • customer outcome testing.

Pillar 2: Risk & compliance

Objective: Minimise regulatory, operational, and conduct risk.

Key measures:

  • file review pass rates
  • breach and incident trends
  • audit findings
  • training completion rates
  • complaint volumes
  • regulatory remediation actions.

Example controls:

  • quality assurance framework
  • incident management program
  • compliance monitoring plan
  • risk assessments
  • broker supervision/mentoring framework.

Pillar 3: Governance & culture

Objective: Ensure accountability and continuous improvement.

Key measures:

  • policy review completion
  • management committee reporting
  • staff engagement
  • risk culture assessments
  • control effectiveness ratings.

Example controls:

  • governance committees
  • operational and board reporting dashboards
  • accountability matrices
  • performance management linked to conduct outcomes.

Achieving the right level of investment

Importantly, there is an art in getting the balance right. Effective organisations recognise that governance, compliance, and risk management investments should be aligned to the size, complexity, and risk profile of the business.

For a five-broker business, a simplified monitoring program and quarterly risk reviews may be sufficient. For a 200-broker aggregation group, dedicated risk resources, formal governance committees, risk appetite statements, thematic reviews, and enterprise-wide reporting may be necessary.

The objective is not to create bureaucracy. The objective is to establish fit-for-purpose controls that support growth, strengthen resilience, and provide confidence to customers, lenders, regulators, and stakeholders.

Ultimately, the most successful brokers and aggregators will not be those that simply grow the fastest, but those that can demonstrate sustainable, well-governed growth. Organisations that integrate commercial performance with effective risk management, strong compliance disciplines, and continuous improvement will be better positioned to adapt, compete, and thrive in an increasingly complex regulatory environment.

Leo Gagic is CEO of the Finance Brokers Association of Australia (FBAA), bringing decades of senior leadership experience across finance, lending, and credit.

A graduate of the Australian Institute of Company Directors with an MBA and bachelor of business from Monash University, he is passionate about delivering the best outcomes for finance and mortgage brokers and Australian consumers who put their trust in our industry.

Want to see more stories from trusted news sources?
Make The Adviser a preferred news source on Google.
Click here to add The Adviser as a preferred news source.

leo gagic fbaa ta drsepg