Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
Court finds Storm Financial provided bad advice
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.

Court finds Storm Financial provided bad advice

Staff Reporter 2 minute read

The Federal Court has found that the directors of Storm Financial breached their duties under the Corporations Act and allowed for inappropriate advice, ASIC has said.

In a statement last week, the corporate regulator said Emmanuel and Julie Cassimatis had created a system through Storm Financial that provided ‘one-size-fits-all’ investment advice.

By the time Storm collapsed in 2009, many of the firm's clients were in negative equity positions and sustained significant losses, ASIC said.

ASIC had advanced a case against the Cassimatises based on a sample of investors who were advised to invest with the Storm model.

The regulator alleged that the advice was inappropriate to the investors’ personal circumstances, “considering that each of the investors were alleged to be over 50 years old, were retired or approaching and planning for retirement, had little or limited income, few assets and had little or no prospect of rebuilding their financial position in the event of suffering significant loss".

Advertisement
Advertisement

ASIC also alleged that the Cassimatises had caused Storm to contravene its obligations under the Corporations Act and that they “did not exercise their powers as directors of Storm with the degree of care and diligence that a reasonable person would have exercised in that situation”, the statement said.

Last week, the Federal Court determined that Storm did in fact provide inappropriate advice and that the Cassimatises would have known about it.
ASIC commissioner Greg Tanzer said: “This is an important decision which emphasises the importance of directors' duties to ensure that they do not cause the companies that they control to breach the law.

“The decision also highlights the significant obligation on financial services licensees to provide financial advice that is appropriate to the persons to whom it is given.”

The matter will be listed for a further hearing to determine what civil penalties and disqualification orders should be imposed on the Cassimatises as a result of their breach of their directors' duties.

Court finds Storm Financial provided bad advice
default
TheAdviser logo
default
James Mitchell

James Mitchell

James Mitchell has over eight years’ experience as a financial reporter and is the editor of Wealth and Wellness at Momentum Media.

He has a sound pedigree to cover the business of mortgages and the converging financial services sector having reported for leading finance titles InvestorDaily, InvestorWeekly, Accountants Daily, ifa, Mortgage Business, Residential Property Manager, Real Estate Business, SMSF Adviser, Smart Property Investment, and The Adviser.

He has also been published in The Daily Telegraph and contributed online to FST Media and Mergermarket, part of the Financial Times Group.

James holds a BA (Hons) in English Literature and an MA in Journalism.

 

FROM THE WEB
more from the adviser
NAB announces new CEO

National Australia Bank has appointed the CEO of Royal Bank of Sc...

‘Stick to what you know’: Associations hit back at CHOICE

The FBAA and MFAA have slammed consumer group CHOICE for its “d...

Peer-to-peer lender joins AFG panel

RateSetter has joined the panel of aggregation company AFG, givin...