![]()
Income verification critical for low docs: ASIC4020 people have read this article
|
| Friday, 18 November 2011 | |||
|
Simon Parker Low doc loans have been singled out as an area of compliance concern under the new NCCP requirements, an ASIC review of mortgage brokers has found. The review, which looked at 16 mortgage brokers’ compliance in the six months since NCCP regulations were introduced, pinpointed low doc loans as an area at risk of non-compliance with the responsible lending requirements where credit assistance was provided. The major risk in terms of non-compliance with the responsible lending for loans promoted as low doc was the steps taken to verify a consumer’s income, said Greg Kirk, senior executive leader, deposit takers credit and insurers, at ASIC. “The requirement is for brokers to make reasonable inquiries about the borrower’s needs, objectives, financial circumstances and an active effort to verify those financial circumstances when assessing suitability for any proposed loan. “The key risk identified was brokers taking inadequate steps to verify the consumer’s income and other financial circumstances,” he said. Given low doc loans compliance with responsible lending required a bigger shift from past practice than standard mainstream home loans, the review placed particular emphasis on brokers who marketed themselves as providers of low doc loans, said Greg Kirk, senior executive leader deposit takers credit and insurers of ASIC. While the brokers were aware that the review was taking place, low doc loans were still identified as a risk area when it came to these brokers complying with the responsible lending obligations. “Loans promoted as low doc were a particular focus given the role these products played in the lead up to the US sub-prime crisis and in equity stripping as identified in ASIC’s March 2008 report, Protecting Wealth in the Family Home,” ASIC Commissioner Peter Kell said. While overall most brokers were fulfilling the new responsible lending obligations and attempting to adhere, there was still room for improvement, the review found.
|










Comments
ASIC are doing exactly what is expected of them, and doing a good job of it too. ASIC's role is to simply enforce approved legislation.
Don't kick the messenger. Kick the government !!
My fear is for the clients that have low doc home loans currently. They are completely vulnerable...They cannot upgrade, they cannot downgrade, they cannot sell and buy, they cannot increase their current debt. basically they have one option sell up..and rent..
Hopefully the regulators are proud of themselves because I am not looking forward to telling my clients when thry contact me in the future... to sell their house....
This applies to all loans. Not only to LOW DOC.
ASIC need to formulate rules to protect RESPONSIBLE lending through lenders when they design products and brokers should be given clear guidelines to sell their loans.
Then, if a broker does not comply, you can blame that broker.
I can see lot of differences created by ASIC regulations that are a disadvantage to brokers than to a lenders direct sale and someone need to address it quickly.
It is really simple,follow the MFAA guidelines have extensive file notes on Board and you will be with in the legislation. ASIC are merely the Sheriff here, not one politician will understand what the consequences of this NCCP legislation is on Genuine Lo Doc borrowers .
Can any one explain to me how a person who wants 60% or less LVR on a house, has had an ABN number for say 3 or more years and has a clear Veda file , is readily Identified and seeks separate Legal advice is at risk , in the good old days solicitors did these using clients money and in 99.99% of all loans never lost a cent!! Now who knows !! it is time to go to the pub its Friday afternoon!
1/ To be "fair" to ASIC, they are not the Legislators but the enforcers of the Legislation. I found them to be very reasonable and "helpful". My main beef was that we were extensively audited in Jan but didn't get the results until 9 months later - that's another 9 months of potential issues.
2/ JonL and TonyH are "on the money" - the Lenders are the ones with the expensive Legal teams, we are just little guys trying to make a living. Having said this, it has all tightened up now, so it probably doesn't matter any more.
End result - we are pretty much out of business. The Legislation was necessary and a gross over reaction to a non existent problem - another Govt sledgehammer to crack a peanut.
As a collective society, we should be very worried for the future of our Kids ... it's "big brother everything" these days - I'm over it, off to the Pub.
Just tell the banks they cant lend Low Doc if its too dangerous - see how the banks' shareprice reacts.
RSS feed for comments to this post